Film Review: The Hunger Games

I’d never heard of The Hunger Games series of books until I started hearing hype about the film version of the first book. They’re teenage fiction so I suppose they’d passed me by. When I did hear about them, what I heard was positive, and the film got good reviews so I went to see it.

The story is set in futuristic and dystopian America, called Panem. It’s ruled by a region (or possibly just a city, it’s not too clear) called the Capitol. There are 12 outlying districts, some of which are very poor. In penance for a failed uprising years previously, every year a boy and girl between 12 and 18 are chosen at random from each district. The 24 “tributes” head to the Capitol to compete in the Hunger Games.

The Games are a brutal fight to the death between the teenagers. The winner is the last tribute standing. Tributes receive training in fighting and survival skills before being sent to a large but enclosed area for the fight. The Games can take days as the tributes try to survive. Some take an aggressive position and try to hunt down their rivals, whilst others simply try to survive by hiding and outlasting the others. They have to find food, water and shelter to survive. All the while, their exploits are broadcast to their fellow citizens.

Our heroine is Katniss Everdeen, a girl from District 12 who volunteers for tribute in place of her younger sister. Katniss is an engaging protagonist, flawed enough to seem real while still being easy to root for. The male chosen from District 12 is Peeta. The two come to support and rely on each other to an extent, which is difficult as the rules state only one can survive. How will this affect their relationship?

A few minor quibbles. At times the camerawork is frustratingly jerky, making it dificult to follow the action. I appreciate that in order to get the film the necessary PG13 classification the director had to do something to suggest the horrific violence without actually showing it, but it could have been a little less all over the place. On other occasions the action cut away to the tv presenters discussing the events for their audience as they happened. This slowed the pace somewhat, but it was interesting to see the action from the audience’s point of view.

On the plus side, the acting is stellar throughout. Jennifer Lawrence will really make a name for herself after her performance as Katniss and she is ably assisted by Josh Hutcherson as Peeta, as well as more recognisable supporting actors including Woody Harrelson, Stanley Tucci, Donald Sutherland and even Lenny Kravitz.

Book to film translations often struggle to convey all the information necessary for those who haven’t read the book to understand the film. The Hunger Games succeeds. Sure, there are certain things which I’m sure are crystal clear in the book which I felt could have been portrayed better (Katniss’s friend Gale seems to be a potential love interest, but is it one-sided? Given the cruelty and brutality of it, why do people watch the Hunger Games at all?) but nothing which really causes a problem. In fact, this stands extremely well on its own.

8.5/10

Advertisements

About elentari86

Apparently blogs need to cover a certain niche in order to attract readers. My aim is not to attract readers. I don't deny it would be nice not to just be spouting to myself, but the reason I set this blog up was to give myself somewhere to write down my thoughts. If anyone reads them, that's a bonus. This blog will cover a mix of things - anything that comes to mind that I want to write about. I make no promises about how often I will publish new content.
This entry was posted in Films, Review and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Film Review: The Hunger Games

  1. Interesting, as I’ve read the book but not seen the film. Even though it’s American while they are very British, it reminded me a lot of John Christopher (Tripods) or John Wyndham in mood. A bit of a page-turner, too!

    As for why people watch the games – the book makes a lot of how the state coerces them to watch – but it’s probably also the same ghoulishness that made public hangings so popular, too…

  2. elentari86 says:

    Thanks for that. I assumed it would be something covered in the book.

    Interesting that you say the books are vey British. I understood the author to be American, is that incorrect? Or did you just mean they have a British feel to them?

  3. Having watched – and thoroughly enjoyed – the film, I was inspired to go on and read the next two books in the trilogy. Its easy to pick up the second book from where the film left off, and there were no gaping plot holes that left me with questions. I’d thoroughly recommend trying out the second and third installments if you fancy a good read and can’t wait for the film sequel!

  4. Sosha says:

    I’m planning to watch the film!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s